Apparently I'm on a Biblical archaeology stint here. The Jerusalem Post reports the supposed discovery of an ancient quarry where King Herod's workers chiseled huge high-quality limestones for the construction of the Second Temple, including the Western Wall.
Sunday, September 23, 2007
2nd Temple Quarry Found
Posted by
Ethicist Watch
at
10:13 PM
|
Labels: archaeology, extra-Biblical, history, temple
Sunday, September 9, 2007
Ancient Escape Tunnel Found
In a nod to the fundies, archaeologists recently discovered an underground drainage tunnel that was used as an escape route for Jerusalemites 2,000 years ago when they were attacked by the Romans. I like this extrabiblical stuff.
Check out the AP news story here.
Posted by
Ethicist Watch
at
11:10 PM
|
Labels: destruction, extra-Biblical, temple
Sunday, August 26, 2007
Did Amalek Really Exist?
The title of this post is self-explanatory. I don't think that there is any extra-Biblical evidence for Amalek. Do you know of any? (Arab traditions cite Amalek as an extremely powerful group, but I'm thinking more of archaeology than other people's mesorahs.)
Possibilities:
1. Amalek existed as described in Tanach
2. Amalek existed, but was nothing like what the Torah describes
3. Amalek never existed
Ideas:
In Ages in Chaos, Immanuel Velikovsky identified the Amalekites with the Hyksos. If this is true it royally screws with those who believe that Hyksos = Jews in Egypt.
Apologetic view: The Jews followed God's commandment, wiping out Amalek and leavinging behind no evidence that they ever existed.
If anyone here reads and understands German, I found this reference which possibly addresses this question: "Nöldeke, Ueber die Amalekiter und einige andere Nachbarvölker der Israeliten, Göttingen, 1864."
So two questions: Did Amalek actually exist? Do you have any extra-Biblical evidence to back up the contention that they did?
Posted by
Ethicist Watch
at
1:11 AM
|
Labels: amalek, extra-Biblical